Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Old Model is Olympus SH-1
- Later Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus SH-2 and Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SH-2 was released 5 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SH-2 grades versus the Tough-3000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus Tough-3000
SH-2 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 63 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus SH-2
Tough-3000 | SH-2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Olympus Tough-3000
SH-2 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-2 comes with physical measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-2 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the SH-2 and the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a2e8/2a2e8abd2194cfe95e088f92dd039cb39bf060d7" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and Tough-3000 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad12f/ad12f4d674398799fb2599774962d6bf905bf0c3" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The photograph below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-2 and Tough-3000.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-2 to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher SH-2 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ff3b/0ff3b7ad27393738ee5b9469dfb3b699a9cd592a" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d75fe/d75fec467a03e03ce9bbcb3936786699245644e6" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Other name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-03-11 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $399 | $0 |