Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-145
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus SH-2 versus Olympus VG-145, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is fairly close and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-2 was announced 3 years after the VG-145 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SH-2 scores versus the VG-145 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Olympus VG-145. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus VG-145
| SH-2 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2015 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 45 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus SH-2
| VG-145 | SH-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Olympus VG-145
| SH-2 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-2 comes with external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-2 versus Olympus VG-145 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the SH-2 and the VG-145.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and VG-145 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-2 and VG-145.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus SH-2 to render more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent SH-2 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus VG-145 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2015-03-11 | 2011-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 120 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 160 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $399 | $0 |