Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VR-330
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Later Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very similar and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SH-2 was launched 4 years later than the VR-330 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the SH-2 scores against the VR-330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-2 and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus VR-330
| SH-2 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2015 |  | February 2011 | More recent by 50 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus SH-2
| VR-330 | SH-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Olympus VR-330
| SH-2 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-2 has got physical dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the SH-2 versus the VR-330.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and VR-330 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading specifications. The visual here will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and VR-330.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-2 to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern SH-2 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2015-03-11 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $399 | $220 |