Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- New Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus SH-2 versus Olympus XZ-1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the SH-2 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SH-2 was released 4 years after the XZ-1 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SH-2 matches up versus the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Olympus XZ-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus XZ-1
SH-2 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2015 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 51 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus SH-2
XZ-1 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Olympus XZ-1
SH-2 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-2 offers physical dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-2 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-2 versus the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a8ad/1a8ad917c15f57e72ebb07b925fa3e254add57b4" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-2 and XZ-1 is 88 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d0f7/7d0f7bdb00898e6d3c3e9d307fb899b67f09e14b" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and XZ-1.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SH-2 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Olympus SH-2 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher SH-2 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecd1e/ecd1e9a22dbe449e1fa56cdff8e59a7777f77a85" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c91e/5c91ea54073a455838d4ab87a4792fe5f0d51b52" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-03-11 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | 320 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $399 | $567 |