Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS200
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Later Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Released February 2018
- Also Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus SH-2 versus Panasonic ZS200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the SH-2 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") boast different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-2 was introduced 3 years before the ZS200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SH-2 scores against the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Panasonic ZS200
SH-2 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus SH-2
ZS200 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | March 2015 | More recent by 35 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1240k | 460k | Clearer screen (+780k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic ZS200
SH-2 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-2 comes with outer dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-2 versus Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SH-2 vs the ZS200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and ZS200 is 88 and 86 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The visual here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-2 and ZS200.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SH-2 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will produce more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older SH-2 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-03-11 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 340 gr (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | 370 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $399 | $800 |