Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX48
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Older Model is Olympus SH-1
- New Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX40
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX48, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and FX48 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-2 was launched 6 years after the FX48 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the SH-2 matches up against the FX48 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Panasonic FX48
| SH-2 | FX48 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2015 | January 2009 | More modern by 75 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus SH-2
| FX48 | SH-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic FX48
| SH-2 | FX48 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SH-2 offers outside measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic FX48 has specifications of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX48 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the SH-2 and the FX48.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and FX48 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The image below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-2 and FX48.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-2 to give you extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern SH-2 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-03-11 | 2009-01-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.5fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $399 | $325 |