Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc5a2/dc5a23e639490cb05b989f13eba4ea99bfc355d5" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Replacement is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus SH-2 versus Panasonic FX90, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and FX90 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SH-2 was released 3 years later than the FX90 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the SH-2 grades vs the FX90 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Panasonic FX90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Panasonic FX90
SH-2 | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2015 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 44 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus SH-2
FX90 | SH-2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic FX90
SH-2 | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SH-2 provides exterior dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic FX90 has specifications of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-2 versus Panasonic FX90 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the SH-2 compared to the FX90.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77b2a/77b2a55a1d64729b1cc40f5b6e201f67db434fa8" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and FX90 is 88 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00085/00085536244f6b432dbedc6d326d608cfb0f4f81" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-2 and FX90.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus SH-2 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent SH-2 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2143/c2143ac2f8919f37032cc75b2d7dfc90c25e77cb" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/828c1/828c125164c47dbf76ebe09c8bb3a4b243462722" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-03-11 | 2011-08-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.5fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | 200 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $399 | $227 |