Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic G95
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Replacement is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Revealed April 2019
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-G90
- Replaced the Panasonic G85
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic G95, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the SH-2 (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-2 was launched 5 years earlier than the G95 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the SH-2 matches up against the G95 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Panasonic G95
SH-2 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus SH-2
G95 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2019 | March 2015 | Fresher by 49 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 460k | Crisper screen (+780k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic G95
SH-2 | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SH-2 has outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic G95 has specifications of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") and a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic G95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the SH-2 vs the G95.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-2 and G95 is 88 and 67 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The photograph here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-2 and G95.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SH-2 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Panasonic G95 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 4.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older SH-2 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-03-11 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20.3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 536 gr (1.18 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | 290 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $399 | $998 |