Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS35
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Successor is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS40
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SH-2 was manufactured 15 months later than the ZS35 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SH-2 scores against the ZS35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Panasonic ZS35
SH-2 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2015 | January 2014 | Fresher by 15 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus SH-2
ZS35 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic ZS35
SH-2 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-2 has external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the SH-2 against the ZS35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-2 and ZS35 is 88 and 89 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-2 and ZS35.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photos however you should really take the age of the products into consideration. The newer SH-2 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-03-11 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.5fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 pounds) | 305g (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $399 | $300 |