Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh CX1
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Older Model is Olympus SH-1
- Updated by Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh CX1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-2 was introduced 6 years later than the CX1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the SH-2 grades vs the CX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Ricoh CX1
| SH-2 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2015 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 74 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus SH-2
| CX1 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Ricoh CX1
| SH-2 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-2 provides external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the SH-2 compared to the CX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and CX1 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-2 and CX1.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus SH-2 to offer more detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger SH-2 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2015-03-11 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 pounds) | 180g (0.40 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $299 |