Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh PX
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Successor is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced August 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh PX, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the PX (16MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SH-2 was introduced 3 years after the PX which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SH-2 scores against the PX in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Ricoh PX. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Ricoh PX
| SH-2 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2015 | August 2011 | More modern by 44 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus SH-2
| PX | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Ricoh PX
| SH-2 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-2 has got exterior measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the SH-2 versus the PX.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and PX is 88 and 95 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The image below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-2 and PX.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs but you have to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger SH-2 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Ricoh PX |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-03-11 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 156 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $399 | $329 |