Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-6
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-6, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the WG-6 (20MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-2 was manufactured 3 years prior to the WG-6 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SH-2 grades versus the WG-6 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-2 and Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery and Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Ricoh WG-6
| SH-2 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus SH-2
| WG-6 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 | March 2015 | Newer by 35 months | |
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Ricoh WG-6
| SH-2 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-2 has outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-6 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-6 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SH-2 against the WG-6.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and WG-6 is 88 and 89 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-2 and WG-6.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-6 to offer more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged SH-2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2015-03-11 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 246 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 340 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $399 | $271 |