Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung HZ25W
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Replacement is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also Known as WB5000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung HZ25W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-2 was released 4 years later than the HZ25W and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the SH-2 matches up versus the HZ25W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Samsung HZ25W
| SH-2 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2015 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus SH-2
| HZ25W | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Samsung HZ25W
| SH-2 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-2 has outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung HZ25W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SH-2 and the HZ25W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and HZ25W is 88 and 70 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and HZ25W.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus SH-2 to offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher SH-2 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called | - | WB5000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2015-03-11 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 428 grams (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $399 | $350 |