Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung SL202
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-1
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus SH-2 versus Samsung SL202, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-2 was brought out 6 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the SH-2 grades vs the SL202 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Samsung SL202
| SH-2 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2015 | February 2009 | Fresher by 74 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus SH-2
| SL202 | SH-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Samsung SL202
| SH-2 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-2 features physical dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-2 versus Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SH-2 compared to the SL202.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and SL202 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-2 and SL202.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-2 to deliver more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger SH-2 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SH-2 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-03-11 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $399 | $140 |