Olympus SH-2 vs Sigma Quattro H
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Olympus SH-2 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus SH-2 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus SH-2 versus Sigma Quattro H, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the SH-2 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) provide different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SH-2 was launched 11 months before the Quattro H which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SH-2 scores versus the Quattro H in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-2 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-2 and Sigma sd Quattro H. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Sigma Quattro H
| SH-2 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Olympus SH-2
| Quattro H | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | March 2015 | Fresher by 11 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 1620k | 460k | Sharper display (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Sigma Quattro H
| SH-2 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-2 features external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-2 versus Sigma Quattro H in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the SH-2 against the Quattro H.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and Quattro H is 88 and 78 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-2 and Quattro H.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SH-2 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 29MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older SH-2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SH-2 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2015-03-11 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames per sec | 3.8 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $399 | $1,134 |