Olympus SH-2 vs Sony S2000
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Updated by Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-2 vs Sony S2000 Overview
The following is a in depth overview of the Olympus SH-2 and Sony S2000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and S2000 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-2 was unveiled 5 years after the S2000 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the SH-2 scores vs the S2000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-2 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Sony S2000
| SH-2 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2015 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 63 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus SH-2
| S2000 | SH-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Sony S2000
| SH-2 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-2 features external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-2 and Sony S2000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SH-2 vs the S2000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and S2000 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The pic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-2 and S2000.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus SH-2 to give greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger SH-2 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-03-11 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $399 | $225 |