Olympus SH-2 vs Sony T900
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Later Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony T900 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus SH-2 vs Sony T900, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-2 was unveiled 6 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SH-2 grades versus the T900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Sony T900
SH-2 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2015 | February 2009 | Fresher by 74 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus SH-2
T900 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Sony T900
SH-2 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-2 provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-2 vs Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the SH-2 vs the T900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and T900 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-2 and T900.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus SH-2 to render greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern SH-2 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-03-11 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 143 gr (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $399 | $300 |