Olympus SH-2 vs Sony TX1
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- New Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Released August 2009
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony TX1 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus SH-2 and Sony TX1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the SH-2 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") possess different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-2 was announced 5 years after the TX1 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SH-2 grades vs the TX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery and Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Sony TX1
SH-2 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2015 | August 2009 | More modern by 69 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Olympus SH-2
TX1 | SH-2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Sony TX1
SH-2 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-2 features external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony TX1 has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-2 and Sony TX1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the SH-2 compared to the TX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and TX1 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and TX1.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SH-2 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-2 will give you extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern SH-2 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-03-11 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 142 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $399 | $350 |