Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX220
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
96 Imaging
42 Features
41 Overall
41
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Released February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX220 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus SH-2 versus Sony WX220, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the WX220 (18MP) is pretty comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SH-2 was introduced 14 months later than the WX220 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the SH-2 scores versus the WX220 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Sony WX220
| SH-2 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2015 | February 2014 | Fresher by 14 months | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus SH-2
| WX220 | SH-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Sony WX220
| SH-2 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-2 comes with external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has proportions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-2 versus Sony WX220 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the SH-2 and the WX220.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-2 and WX220 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and WX220.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony WX220 to produce more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger SH-2 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2015-03-11 | 2014-02-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | 210 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $198 |