Olympus SH-2 vs YI M1
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
87 Imaging
59 Features
66 Overall
61
Olympus SH-2 vs YI M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Later Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 350g - 114 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced September 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-2 vs YI M1 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus SH-2 versus YI M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and YI. The image resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the M1 (20MP) is very similar but the SH-2 (1/2.3") and M1 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SH-2 was unveiled 18 months earlier than the M1 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the YI M1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the SH-2 matches up against the M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-2 vs YI M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & YI M1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & YI M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the YI M1
| SH-2 | M1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick YI M1 over the Olympus SH-2
| M1 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2016 | March 2015 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and YI M1
| SH-2 | M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus SH-2 vs YI M1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-2 offers outer dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the YI M1 has dimensions of 114mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-2 versus YI M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SH-2 versus the M1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and M1 is 88 and 87 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs YI M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading specifications. The visual below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and M1.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SH-2 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the YI M1 will offer greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older SH-2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs YI M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SH-2 vs YI M1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | YI M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | YI |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | YI M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2015-03-11 | 2016-09-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Red-Eye Slow |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 75 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 350 grams (0.77 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 114 x 64 x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 450 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $399 | $320 |