Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus 8000
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus 8000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-3 was launched 6 years after the 8000 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SH-3 grades against the 8000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus 8000
| SH-3 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 81 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus SH-3
| 8000 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus 8000
| SH-3 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 has got outside measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Olympus 8000 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus 8000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the SH-3 against the 8000.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and 8000 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The pic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and 8000.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer SH-3 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
| Also Known as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lbs) | 182g (0.40 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $579 | $380 |