Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-860
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-870
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus TG-860, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is very close and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-3 was announced 13 months later than the TG-860 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SH-3 matches up against the TG-860 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus TG-860
| SH-3 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | February 2015 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus SH-3
| TG-860 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus TG-860
| SH-3 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 has got outside measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus TG-860 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-3 and the TG-860.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and TG-860 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and TG-860.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you have to take the age of the cameras into account. The more recent SH-3 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 224 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $579 | $279 |