Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus SH-3 versus Olympus XZ-10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SH-3 was launched 3 years after the XZ-10 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SH-3 matches up vs the XZ-10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus XZ-10
SH-3 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus SH-3
XZ-10 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus XZ-10
SH-3 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SH-3 comes with physical measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 versus Olympus XZ-10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SH-3 and the XZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7946/c79465807e3a4efee840d23ced87b98c5c1aaf80" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and XZ-10 is 88 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47396/47396d9b4fba024f832774a8b81f7ddb063697e3" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and XZ-10.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus SH-3 to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern SH-3 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f76d5/f76d54638050fb66e327ea52ae937b5fa52e06f4" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2db4b/2db4b55f796ea2aef1ef87403502f150a48fcaa2" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | 240 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $579 | $428 |