Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus SH-3 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SH-3 was launched 3 years after the TG-630 iHS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SH-3 scores vs the TG-630 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SH-3 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | January 2013 | More modern by 38 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus SH-3
| TG-630 iHS | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SH-3 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 enjoys outside measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has proportions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the SH-3 against the TG-630 iHS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and TG-630 iHS is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and TG-630 iHS.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus SH-3 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $579 | $200 |