Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus SH-3 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-3 was launched 3 years after the TG-630 iHS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SH-3 scores vs the TG-630 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SH-3 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | January 2013 | More modern by 38 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus SH-3
| TG-630 iHS | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SH-3 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 enjoys outside measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has proportions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the SH-3 against the TG-630 iHS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and TG-630 iHS is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and TG-630 iHS.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus SH-3 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $579 | $200 |