Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus SH-3 versus Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SH-3 was introduced 5 years after the VR-330 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SH-3 matches up against the VR-330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus VR-330
SH-3 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | February 2011 | More modern by 61 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus SH-3
VR-330 | SH-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus VR-330
SH-3 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-3 versus Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the SH-3 and the VR-330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bda7/3bda7e641fc1e07512da105c396cc28fdf6f9ca4" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and VR-330 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9b8e/c9b8e304fa48b85a7f2a2414193c7099b77ddf52" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The picture below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and VR-330.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus SH-3 to deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern SH-3 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7f7c/a7f7c57801fa30f510e81442e4de74001b70461f" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d9ba/4d9baed7294580b52b36bf7cdc82de068d49c8de" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus VR-330 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.5fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $579 | $220 |