Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus XZ-1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the SH-3 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SH-3 was revealed 5 years after the XZ-1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SH-3 matches up against the XZ-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus XZ-1
SH-3 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 62 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus SH-3
XZ-1 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus XZ-1
SH-3 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 has outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SH-3 vs the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d202/5d202f9b9955862ee4fe9123016751649503f95b" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and XZ-1 is 88 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/012fe/012feddf2f06ca3467458cbe1435113374345538" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The picture here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and XZ-1.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SH-3 using its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus SH-3 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger SH-3 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a9b6/7a9b66bca13b5184ac0890a85d8b3ce9aa036e2f" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f441/4f441c24b4288ec0398d5a715de87644206d360d" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-02-08 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 275 grams (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | 320 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $579 | $567 |