Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a37a7/a37a7bfaeed321f20fbd53c45a152de64dffd65c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FP1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and FP1 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SH-3 was released 6 years later than the FP1 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SH-3 scores against the FP1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Panasonic FP1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FP1
SH-3 | FP1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 75 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP1 over the Olympus SH-3
FP1 | SH-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FP1
SH-3 | FP1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-3 enjoys outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Panasonic FP1 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FP1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the SH-3 vs the FP1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7481/a7481c8dbfd9af6f07e27428d5e700d3809278a1" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and FP1 is 88 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c48c/5c48ca97c792b5c312adb2055b20d621f107e725" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and FP1.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to show more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern SH-3 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47bad/47bad537e461f0fa2e678115c14a0772b3599a4f" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77f3d/77f3d49b2e6c41022eeddd9d80ea2a01646de2ba" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2016-02-08 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.5fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 lbs) | 151g (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $579 | $153 |