Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP3
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
95 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 155g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP3 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FP3, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the FP3 (14MP) is very comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-3 was manufactured 6 years later than the FP3 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP3 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the SH-3 scores versus the FP3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Panasonic FP3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FP3
| SH-3 | FP3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 75 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP3 over the Olympus SH-3
| FP3 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FP3
| SH-3 | FP3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP3 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 comes with external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP3 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FP3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SH-3 vs the FP3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and FP3 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and FP3.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to show greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FP3 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2016-02-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $579 | $182 |