Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14843/14843fe54ad829f1dcedf3904c1935557340eb3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 136g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FS15, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and FS15 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SH-3 was launched 7 years after the FS15 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS15 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SH-3 grades vs the FS15 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Panasonic FS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FS15
SH-3 | FS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 86 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS15 over the Olympus SH-3
FS15 | SH-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FS15
SH-3 | FS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 features outer dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS15 has sizing of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FS15 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the SH-3 against the FS15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63a3b/63a3bbab1f25022e535863c05ee7c63bba642695" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and FS15 is 88 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfb8c/cfb8c40cf3d0a295af8c74b615e6d25883f669a5" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-3 and FS15.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger SH-3 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/243c0/243c02edd7ca43378a5077a8a565e8029eefa434" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aabb/4aabb5d8dbe701735d7b67d51e452e75ee3123db" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS15 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2009-01-16 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $579 | $180 |