Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX75
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FX75, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-3 was introduced 5 years after the FX75 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the SH-3 grades versus the FX75 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FX75
SH-3 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | June 2010 | Newer by 70 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus SH-3
FX75 | SH-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FX75
SH-3 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 enjoys exterior dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic FX75 has measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the SH-3 and the FX75.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and FX75 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The picture underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and FX75.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus SH-3 to result in greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer SH-3 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-02-08 | 2010-06-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 7.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $579 | $139 |