Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14531/14531b22504a4959f06ffa69a9ec4d9107943879" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front"
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
- New Model is Panasonic FZ300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SH-3 was announced 3 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SH-3 scores vs the FZ200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FZ200
SH-3 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | ![]() | July 2012 | More recent by 44 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus SH-3
FZ200 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FZ200
SH-3 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical display resolution |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 provides outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SH-3 vs the FZ200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d420/0d420d8a8e564d7cdadb0bf2074d836b8613bffd" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and FZ200 is 88 and 65 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21bd0/21bd0cbe825aaa40df5a7748c35773770cdff31e" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The photograph below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and FZ200.
As you have seen, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to show greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb370/cb370de75e5d6e0f2ea88e29739bb935f20b9da6" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3d78/a3d78aca86337e95c6223c5644f78e5cf015e7a0" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 lbs) | 588g (1.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | 540 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $579 | $499 |