Clicky

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45
Olympus Stylus SH-3 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Launched February 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Introduced July 2012
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • New Model is Panasonic FZ300
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The SH-3 was announced 3 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SH-3 scores vs the FZ200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FZ200

 SH-3 FZ200 
IntroducedFebruary 2016July 2012More recent by 44 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus SH-3

 FZ200 SH-3 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FZ200

 SH-3 FZ200 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Display resolution460k460kIdentical display resolution

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 provides outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Check out the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SH-3 vs the FZ200.

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and FZ200 is 88 and 65 respectively.

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The photograph below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and FZ200.

As you have seen, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to show greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SH-3 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Portrait photography camera
44
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
48
has manual focus
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000 seconds)
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Street photography features
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography features
70
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
offers focus by touch
lighter than others in class (271g)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
57
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than average (588g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus SH-3 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Sports photography camera
51
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
great battery pack (380 CIPA)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
46
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
great battery (540 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Travel photography info
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography info
74
great battery pack (380 per charge)
lighter than others in class (271g)
offers focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.0)
55
great battery (540 shots)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
really wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than average (588g)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SH-3 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Landscape photography camera
55
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports RAW formats
great battery pack (380 shots)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
48
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
great battery (540 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Vlogging factors
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging factors
35
really wide (25mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
lighter than others in class (271g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no external mic support
63
really wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have mic port
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than average (588 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus Stylus SH-3Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus Stylus SH-3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2016-02-08 2012-07-18
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 125 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 23
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-600mm (24.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/2.8
Macro focus range 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 11.5 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) 13.50 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 271g (0.60 lbs) 588g (1.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 37
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.8
DXO Low light score not tested 114
Other
Battery life 380 images 540 images
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-92B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $579 $499