Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the FZ2500 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the SH-3 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") posses different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SH-3 was released 7 months prior to the FZ2500 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SH-3 grades vs the FZ2500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FZ2500
SH-3 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus SH-3
FZ2500 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | February 2016 | More recent by 7 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FZ2500
SH-3 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 enjoys exterior dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has measurements of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") and a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FZ2500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the SH-3 and the FZ2500.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and FZ2500 is 88 and 53 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The visual here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-3 and FZ2500.
All in all, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SH-3 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older SH-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-02-08 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 915 gr (2.02 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 350 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $579 | $998 |