Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZR3
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
94 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-ZX3
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic ZR3, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the ZR3 (14MP) is very similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-3 was released 6 years after the ZR3 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the SH-3 matches up versus the ZR3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic ZR3
| SH-3 | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 74 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus SH-3
| ZR3 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic ZR3
| SH-3 | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 features outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR3 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic ZR3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the SH-3 vs the ZR3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and ZR3 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-3 and ZR3.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The younger SH-3 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
| Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2010-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $579 | $280 |