Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45


84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013

Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus SH-3 versus Pentax MX-1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and MX-1 (12MP) and the SH-3 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.

The SH-3 was unveiled 2 years later than the MX-1 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the SH-3 scores vs the MX-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Pentax MX-1. The full galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Pentax MX-1
SH-3 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | ![]() | July 2013 | More recent by 32 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus SH-3
MX-1 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Pentax MX-1
SH-3 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 has exterior dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Pentax MX-1 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") having a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-3 versus Pentax MX-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the SH-3 versus the MX-1.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and MX-1 is 88 and 84 respectively.

Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The visual here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-3 and MX-1.
All in all, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SH-3 with its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Olympus SH-3 will give more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Pentax MX-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Pentax MX-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2013-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) | 391 gr (0.86 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 290 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | D-Li-106 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $579 | $400 |