Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus SH-3 versus Pentax MX-1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and MX-1 (12MP) and the SH-3 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SH-3 was unveiled 2 years later than the MX-1 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the SH-3 scores vs the MX-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Pentax MX-1. The full galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Pentax MX-1
SH-3 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | July 2013 | More recent by 32 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus SH-3
MX-1 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Pentax MX-1
SH-3 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 has exterior dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Pentax MX-1 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") having a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-3 versus Pentax MX-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the SH-3 versus the MX-1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and MX-1 is 88 and 84 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The visual here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-3 and MX-1.
All in all, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SH-3 with its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Olympus SH-3 will give more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Pentax MX-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Pentax MX-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2013-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) | 391 gr (0.86 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 290 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | D-Li-106 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $579 | $400 |