Clicky

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45
Olympus Stylus SH-3 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Released February 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus SH-2
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Released September 2011
  • Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SH-3 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") have different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SH-3 was brought out 4 years later than the GR Digital IV and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SH-3 matches up versus the GR Digital IV for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SH-3 GR Digital IV 
ReleasedFebruary 2016September 2011Fresher by 54 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus SH-3

 GR Digital IV SH-3 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display resolution1230k460kSharper display (+770k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SH-3 GR Digital IV 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 provides external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Examine the Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the SH-3 versus the GR Digital IV.

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and GR Digital IV is 88 and 92 respectively.

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The visual below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and GR Digital IV.

As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SH-3 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus SH-3 will produce greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger SH-3 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography advice
44
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW files
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
41
focusing manually
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SH-3
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
70
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
has touch to focus
lighter than average (271g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Sports photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography advice
51
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
good battery power (380 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery power (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Travel photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography features
74
good battery power (380 shots)
lighter than average (271g)
has touch to focus
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
67
great battery power (390 shots)
flash built-in
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SH-3 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
55
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
exports RAW files
good battery power (380 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
53
focusing manually
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
great battery power (390 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SH-3 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
35
relatively wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
lighter than average (271g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic socket
29
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus Stylus SH-3Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus SH-3 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2016-02-08 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 125 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-600mm (24.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/1.9
Macro focus range 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 11.5 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 271g (0.60 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 pictures 390 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-92B DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $579 $599