Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SH-3 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") have different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SH-3 was brought out 4 years later than the GR Digital IV and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SH-3 matches up versus the GR Digital IV for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
| SH-3 | GR Digital IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | September 2011 | Fresher by 54 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus SH-3
| GR Digital IV | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Sharper display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
| SH-3 | GR Digital IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 provides external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the SH-3 versus the GR Digital IV.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and GR Digital IV is 88 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The visual below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and GR Digital IV.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SH-3 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus SH-3 will produce greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger SH-3 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2016-02-08 | 2011-09-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 390 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $579 | $599 |