Clicky

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II

Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus SH-3 front
 
Ricoh GR II front
Portability
89
Imaging
58
Features
55
Overall
56

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs

Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Launched February 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus SH-2
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Announced June 2015
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh GR II, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the GR II (16MP) is pretty close but the SH-3 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The SH-3 was brought out 8 months after the GR II and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SH-3 grades against the GR II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Ricoh GR II

 SH-3 GR II 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016June 2015Newer by 8 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus SH-3

 GR II SH-3 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen resolution1230k460kClearer screen (+770k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh GR II

 SH-3 GR II 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 features outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Ricoh GR II has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).

Compare the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh GR II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the SH-3 compared to the GR II.

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and GR II is 88 and 89 respectively.

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The picture here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and GR II.

As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The SH-3 has the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF tougher. The younger SH-3 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus SH-3
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR II
44
good resolution (16MP)
offers face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
74
manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SH-3
Street photography with Ricoh GR II
70
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
boasts touch focus
lighter than competitors in class (271 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
74
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than others (251g)
above average high ISO (25,600)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus SH-3 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR II as a Sports photography camera
51
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
good battery life (380 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
50
decent MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
can't change focal length (28mm)
max fps very slow (4.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Travel photography details
Ricoh GR II Travel photography details
74
good battery life (380 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (271g)
boasts touch focus
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
67
lighter than others (251g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR II Landscape photography advice
54
relatively wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (380 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
59
manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SH-3 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR II as a Vlogging camera
34
relatively wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (271 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of mic socket
32
provides face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (251g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
lack of external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh GR II
 Olympus Stylus SH-3Ricoh GR II
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus SH-3 Ricoh GR II
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2016-02-08 2015-06-17
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII GR Engine V
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Minimum native ISO 125 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-600mm (24.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/2.8-16.0
Macro focus range 3cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 300s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 11.5fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) 3.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 271g (0.60 lbs) 251g (0.55 lbs)
Physical dimensions 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 80
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1078
Other
Battery life 380 images 320 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-92B DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $579 $599