Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-4
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus SH-3 versus Ricoh WG-4, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-3 was launched 2 years after the WG-4 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SH-3 grades against the WG-4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Ricoh WG-4
| SH-3 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | February 2014 | Newer by 25 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus SH-3
| WG-4 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh WG-4
| SH-3 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 has external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the SH-3 vs the WG-4.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and WG-4 is 88 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-3 and WG-4.
Plainly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of images though you should really take the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher SH-3 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 240 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $579 | $330 |