Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-6
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus SH-3 versus Ricoh WG-6, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the WG-6 (20MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-3 was brought out 24 months prior to the WG-6 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SH-3 scores vs the WG-6 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Ricoh WG-6
| SH-3 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus SH-3
| WG-6 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 | February 2016 | More modern by 24 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh WG-6
| SH-3 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 offers physical measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-3 versus Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the SH-3 compared to the WG-6.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and WG-6 is 88 and 89 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and WG-6.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-6 to give more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged SH-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 246g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 340 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $579 | $271 |