Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-3 was unveiled 18 months later than the WG-M1 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SH-3 scores vs the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SH-3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | September 2014 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SH-3
| WG-M1 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh WG-M1
| SH-3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 has exterior measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the SH-3 versus the WG-M1.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and WG-M1 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and WG-M1.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus SH-3 to render greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $579 | $2,000 |