Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1
Portability
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SH-3 was unveiled 18 months later than the WG-M1 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SH-3 scores vs the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SH-3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | September 2014 | More recent by 18 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SH-3
| WG-M1 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh WG-M1
| SH-3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 has exterior measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the SH-3 versus the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and WG-M1 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and WG-M1.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus SH-3 to render greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SH-3 Portrait photography features
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography features
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
delivers RAW files
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
good MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Olympus SH-3 Street photography information
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
provides touch to focus
lighter than others (271g)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
max ISO too low (800)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus SH-3 Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography features
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
good battery life (380 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
good MP (14MP)
environment sealing
good battery power (350 CIPA)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus SH-3 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Travel photography camera
good battery life (380 shots)
lighter than others (271 grams)
provides touch to focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
good battery power (350 per charge)
environment sealing
good MP (14MP)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus SH-3 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (380 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
good MP (14MP)
environment sealing
good battery power (350 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (1.5")
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (800)
has no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus SH-3
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-M1
really wide (25mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
lighter than others (271g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone support
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
does not have mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $579 | $2,000 |