Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung PL200
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
94 Imaging
36 Features
22 Overall
30
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung PL200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SH-3 was unveiled 5 years after the PL200 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the SH-3 matches up versus the PL200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Samsung PL200. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Samsung PL200
| SH-3 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 68 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Olympus SH-3
| PL200 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung PL200
| SH-3 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 has external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung PL200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SH-3 against the PL200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and PL200 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through technical specs. The image here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and PL200.
As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus SH-3 to provide you with extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer SH-3 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung PL200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2016-02-08 | 2010-07-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 170 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $579 | $0 |