Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL620
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45


94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also Known as PL65

Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung SL620, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The SH-3 was unveiled 7 years later than the SL620 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SH-3 scores against the SL620 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Samsung SL620. The full galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Samsung SL620
SH-3 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 85 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Olympus SH-3
SL620 | SH-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung SL620
SH-3 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 offers outer dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the SH-3 against the SL620.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and SL620 is 88 and 94 respectively.

Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and SL620.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus SH-3 to show greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger SH-3 provides an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung SL620 |
Also called as | - | PL65 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2016-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $579 | $200 |