Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB350F
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-3 was launched 2 years after the WB350F which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the SH-3 grades vs the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Samsung WB350F
| SH-3 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | January 2014 | More modern by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus SH-3
| WB350F | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung WB350F
| SH-3 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-3 features outer dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the SH-3 compared to the WB350F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and WB350F is 88 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The image here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-3 and WB350F.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels and you should expect similar quality of files though you will need to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern SH-3 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lbs) | 276g (0.61 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $579 | $260 |