Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB700
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched December 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus SH-3 versus Samsung WB700, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SH-3 was released 5 years later than the WB700 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the SH-3 scores against the WB700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Samsung WB700. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Samsung WB700
| SH-3 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | December 2010 | More recent by 63 months | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Olympus SH-3
| WB700 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung WB700
| SH-3 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-3 provides outside measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 versus Samsung WB700 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SH-3 and the WB700.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and WB700 is 88 and 98 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The photograph here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and WB700.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus SH-3 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung WB700 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2016-02-08 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $579 | $300 |