Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB750
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced September 2011
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SH-3 was released 4 years after the WB750 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the SH-3 scores versus the WB750 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Samsung WB750. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Samsung WB750
| SH-3 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | September 2011 | Newer by 55 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Olympus SH-3
| WB750 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung WB750
| SH-3 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 comes with outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB750 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the SH-3 vs the WB750.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and WB750 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and WB750.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus SH-3 to render greater detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung WB750 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 13MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.5fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $579 | $339 |