Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A200
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Replacement is Sony A230
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A200 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus SH-3 and Sony A200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the SH-3 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SH-3 was released 7 years later than the A200 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SH-3 scores against the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony A200
| SH-3 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | July 2008 | Fresher by 93 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus SH-3
| A200 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony A200
| SH-3 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 comes with exterior dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Sony A200 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-3 and Sony A200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-3 versus the A200.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and A200 is 88 and 66 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The photograph below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and A200.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SH-3 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus SH-3 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer SH-3 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2016-02-08 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 572 grams (1.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $579 | $100 |