Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12c81/12c817401ce2f8957e577f0ee287d1054036861a" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front"
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released June 2008
- Later Model is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the A350 (14MP) is very comparable but the SH-3 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The SH-3 was announced 7 years after the A350 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SH-3 scores against the A350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony A350
SH-3 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 94 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus SH-3
A350 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony A350
SH-3 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus SH-3 offers outside measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the SH-3 and the A350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1481/f148148aa1c16c3a675dba2be960642fc060a65d" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and A350 is 88 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf24f/bf24f12ce57312d0d845abe1b6e3aa4996151f66" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and A350.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SH-3 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus SH-3 will produce greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ecee/5ecee1e64ffe49e58c5349ad432a9099e7e9f86b" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5929/d5929daf4cb402c7d58e662fbe4f278b87e63458" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A350 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2008-06-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 674 grams (1.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 65 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $579 | $600 |