Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
![Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-SH-3/Olympus-SH-3-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200/Sony-H200-front.jpg)
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus SH-3 versus Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The SH-3 was brought out 3 years later than the H200 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SH-3 scores versus the H200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony H200
SH-3 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 38 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus SH-3
H200 | SH-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony H200
SH-3 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 has physical measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Sony H200 has measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-3 versus Sony H200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SH-3 versus the H200.
![Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SH-3-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and H200 is 88 and 67 respectively.
![Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SH-3-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and H200.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Sony H200 to offer you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent SH-3 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
![Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SH-3-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SH-3-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-02-08 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 20cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 6.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 lbs) | 530g (1.17 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | 240 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | LI-92B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $579 | $250 |