Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX350
Portability
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
Sony HX350
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Introduced December 2016
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX350 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 versus Sony HX350, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the HX350 (20MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-3 was announced 10 months earlier than the HX350 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SH-3 grades against the HX350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony HX350
| SH-3 | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Olympus SH-3
| HX350 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2016 |  | February 2016 | More modern by 10 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony HX350
| SH-3 | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 comes with outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Sony HX350 has measurements of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") having a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-3 versus Sony HX350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the SH-3 versus the HX350.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and HX350 is 88 and 62 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The pic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-3 and HX350.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Sony HX350 to produce extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged SH-3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus SH-3
Portrait photography with Sony HX350
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
exports RAW files
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus SH-3 as a Street photography camera
Sony HX350 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
features focus by touch
lighter than average in class (271g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition in class (652 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus SH-3 Sports photography info
Sony HX350 Sports photography info
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (380 CIPA)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus SH-3 as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX350 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
lighter than average in class (271 grams)
features focus by touch
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (652g)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus SH-3 Landscape photography features
Sony HX350 Landscape photography features
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (380 shots)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-3 as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX350 as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (25mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
lighter than average in class (271g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic socket
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external mic port
heavier than competition in class (652 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2016-12-20 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 652 gr (1.44 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | 300 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $579 | - |