Olympus SH-3 vs Sony S2000
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-3 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 and Sony S2000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and S2000 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-3 was brought out 6 years after the S2000 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the SH-3 scores against the S2000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-3 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony S2000
| SH-3 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 75 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus SH-3
| S2000 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony S2000
| SH-3 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 enjoys outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-3 and Sony S2000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the SH-3 and the S2000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and S2000 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The pic below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and S2000.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus SH-3 to render greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2016-02-08 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $579 | $225 |
