Olympus SH-3 vs Sony TX100V
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Announced January 2011
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony TX100V Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus SH-3 versus Sony TX100V, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the TX100V (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-3 was brought out 5 years later than the TX100V and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SH-3 grades vs the TX100V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony TX100V Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony TX100V
SH-3 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | January 2011 | More recent by 62 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Olympus SH-3
TX100V | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony TX100V
SH-3 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus SH-3 has outside measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Sony TX100V has specifications of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-3 versus Sony TX100V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the SH-3 and the TX100V.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and TX100V is 88 and 95 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The graphic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and TX100V.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of photographs however you need to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more modern SH-3 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony TX100V Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 147 grams (0.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $579 | $380 |